In fact, in order to find the area of a figure, you don’t need that much knowledge of the indefinite and definite integral. The task “calculate the area using a definite integral” always involves constructing a drawing, so your knowledge and drawing skills will be a much more pressing issue. In this regard, it is useful to refresh your memory of the graphs of basic elementary functions, and, at a minimum, be able to construct a straight line and a hyperbola.

A curved trapezoid is called flat figure, limited by the axis, straight lines, and the graph of a function continuous on the segment, which does not change sign on this interval. Let this figure be located not less x-axis:

Then the area of a curvilinear trapezoid is numerically equal to a definite integral. Any definite integral (that exists) has a very good geometric meaning.

From the point of view of geometry, the definite integral is AREA.

That is, a certain integral (if it exists) geometrically corresponds to the area of a certain figure. For example, consider the definite integral. The integrand defines a curve on the plane located above the axis (those who wish can make a drawing), and the definite integral itself is numerically equal to the area of the corresponding curvilinear trapezoid.

Example 1

This is a typical assignment statement. First and the most important moment solutions - drawing drawing. Moreover, the drawing must be constructed RIGHT.

When constructing a drawing I recommend next order: at first it is better to construct all straight lines (if they exist) and only Then- parabolas, hyperbolas, graphs of other functions. It is more profitable to build graphs of functions point by point.

In this problem, the solution might look like this.
Let's draw the drawing (note that the equation defines the axis):

On the segment, the graph of the function is located above the axis, That's why:

Answer:

After the task is completed, it is always useful to look at the drawing and figure out whether the answer is real. IN in this case“by eye” we count the number of cells in the drawing - well, there will be about 9, it seems to be true. It is absolutely clear that if we got, say, the answer: 20 square units, then it is obvious that a mistake was made somewhere - 20 cells obviously do not fit into the figure in question, at most a dozen. If the answer is negative, then the task was also solved incorrectly.

Example 3

Calculate the area of the figure bounded by lines and coordinate axes.

Solution: Let's make a drawing:

If a curved trapezoid is located under the axle(or at least not higher given axis), then its area can be found using the formula:

In this case:

Attention! The two types of tasks should not be confused:

1) If you are asked to solve simply a definite integral without any geometric meaning, then it can be negative.

2) If you are asked to find the area of a figure using a definite integral, then the area is always positive! That is why the minus appears in the formula just discussed.

In practice, most often the figure is located in both the upper and lower half-plane, and therefore, from the simplest school problems we move on to more meaningful examples.

Example 4

Find the area of a plane figure bounded by the lines , .

Solution: First you need to complete the drawing. Generally speaking, when constructing a drawing in area problems, we are most interested in the points of intersection of lines. Let's find the intersection points of the parabola and the straight line. This can be done in two ways. The first method is analytical. We solve the equation:

This means that the lower limit of integration is , the upper limit of integration is .

If possible, it is better not to use this method..

It is much more profitable and faster to construct lines point by point, and the limits of integration become clear “by themselves.” Nevertheless, the analytical method of finding limits still sometimes has to be used if, for example, the graph is large enough, or the detailed construction did not reveal the limits of integration (they can be fractional or irrational). And we will also consider such an example.

Let's return to our task: it is more rational to first construct a straight line and only then a parabola. Let's make the drawing:

And now the working formula: If there is some continuous function on the segment greater than or equal to some continuous function , then the area of the figure bounded by the graphs of these functions and the lines , , can be found using the formula:

Here you no longer need to think about where the figure is located - above the axis or below the axis, and, roughly speaking, it matters which graph is HIGHER(relative to another graph), and which one is BELOW.

In the example under consideration, it is obvious that on the segment the parabola is located above the straight line, and therefore it is necessary to subtract from

The completed solution might look like this:

The desired figure is limited by a parabola above and a straight line below.
On the segment, according to the corresponding formula:

Answer:

Example 4

Calculate the area of the figure bounded by the lines , , , .

Solution: First, let's make a drawing:

The figure whose area we need to find is shaded blue(look carefully at the condition - how the figure is limited!). But in practice, due to inattention, a “glitch” often arises that you need to find the area of a figure that is shaded green!

This example is also useful in that it calculates the area of a figure using two definite integrals.

Really:

1) On the segment above the axis there is a graph of a straight line;

2) On the segment above the axis there is a graph of a hyperbola.

It is quite obvious that the areas can (and should) be added, therefore:

Definite integral. How to calculate the area of a figure

Let's move on to consider applications of integral calculus. In this lesson we will analyze the typical and most common task – how to use a definite integral to calculate the area of a plane figure. Finally, those who are looking for meaning in higher mathematics - may they find it. You never know. We'll have to bring it closer in life country cottage area elementary functions and find its area using a definite integral.

To successfully master the material, you must:

1) Understand the indefinite integral at least at an intermediate level. Thus, dummies should first read the lesson Not.

2) Be able to apply the Newton-Leibniz formula and calculate the definite integral. Set up warm friendly relations with definite integrals can be found on the page Definite integral. Examples of solutions.

In fact, in order to find the area of a figure, you don’t need that much knowledge of the indefinite and definite integral. The task “calculate the area using a definite integral” always involves constructing a drawing, so your knowledge and drawing skills will be a much more pressing issue. In this regard, it is useful to refresh your memory of the graphs of basic elementary functions, and, at a minimum, to be able to construct a straight line, parabola and hyperbola. This can be done (for many, it is necessary) using methodological material and articles on geometric transformations of graphs.

Actually, everyone is familiar with the task of finding the area using a definite integral since school, and we will not go much further from school curriculum. This article might not have existed at all, but the fact is that the problem occurs in 99 cases out of 100, when a student suffers from a hated school and enthusiastically masters a course in higher mathematics.

The materials of this workshop are presented simply, in detail and with a minimum of theory.

Let's start with a curved trapezoid.

Curvilinear trapezoid is a flat figure bounded by an axis, straight lines, and the graph of a function continuous on an interval that does not change sign on this interval. Let this figure be located not less x-axis:

Then the area of a curvilinear trapezoid is numerically equal to a definite integral. Any definite integral (that exists) has a very good geometric meaning. At the lesson Definite integral. Examples of solutions I said that a definite integral is a number. And now it’s time to state another useful fact. From the point of view of geometry, the definite integral is AREA.

That is, the definite integral (if it exists) geometrically corresponds to the area of a certain figure. For example, consider the definite integral. The integrand defines a curve on the plane located above the axis (those who wish can make a drawing), and the definite integral itself is numerically equal to the area of the corresponding curvilinear trapezoid.

Example 1

This is a typical assignment statement. The first and most important point in the decision is the construction of a drawing. Moreover, the drawing must be constructed RIGHT.

When constructing a drawing, I recommend the following order: at first it is better to construct all straight lines (if they exist) and only Then– parabolas, hyperbolas, graphs of other functions. It is more profitable to build graphs of functions point by point, the point-by-point construction technique can be found in the reference material Graphs and properties of elementary functions. There you can also find very useful material for our lesson - how to quickly build a parabola.

In this problem, the solution might look like this.
Let's draw the drawing (note that the equation defines the axis):

I will not shade the curved trapezoid; it is obvious here what area we are talking about. The solution continues like this:

On the segment, the graph of the function is located above the axis, That's why:

Answer:

Who has difficulties with calculating the definite integral and applying the Newton-Leibniz formula , refer to the lecture Definite integral. Examples of solutions.

After the task is completed, it is always useful to look at the drawing and figure out whether the answer is real. In this case, we count the number of cells in the drawing “by eye” - well, there will be about 9, it seems to be true. It is absolutely clear that if we got, say, the answer: 20 square units, then it is obvious that a mistake was made somewhere - 20 cells obviously do not fit into the figure in question, at most a dozen. If the answer is negative, then the task was also solved incorrectly.

Example 2

Calculate the area of a figure bounded by lines , , and axis

This is an example for you to solve on your own. Full solution and answer at the end of the lesson.

What to do if the curved trapezoid is located under the axle?

Example 3

Calculate the area of the figure bounded by lines and coordinate axes.

Solution: Let's make a drawing:

If a curved trapezoid is located under the axle(or at least not higher given axis), then its area can be found using the formula:
In this case:

Attention! The two types of tasks should not be confused:

1) If you are asked to solve simply a definite integral without any geometric meaning, then it may be negative.

2) If you are asked to find the area of a figure using a definite integral, then the area is always positive! That is why the minus appears in the formula just discussed.

In practice, most often the figure is located in both the upper and lower half-plane, and therefore, from the simplest school problems we move on to more meaningful examples.

Example 4

Find the area of a plane figure bounded by the lines , .

This means that the lower limit of integration is , the upper limit of integration is .
If possible, it is better not to use this method..

It is much more profitable and faster to construct lines point by point, and the limits of integration become clear “by themselves.” The point-by-point construction technique for various graphs is discussed in detail in the help Graphs and properties of elementary functions. Nevertheless, the analytical method of finding limits still sometimes has to be used if, for example, the graph is large enough, or the detailed construction did not reveal the limits of integration (they can be fractional or irrational). And we will also consider such an example.

Let's return to our task: it is more rational to first construct a straight line and only then a parabola. Let's make the drawing:

I repeat that when constructing pointwise, the limits of integration are most often found out “automatically”.

In the example under consideration, it is obvious that on the segment the parabola is located above the straight line, and therefore it is necessary to subtract from

The completed solution might look like this:

The desired figure is limited by a parabola above and a straight line below.
On the segment, according to the corresponding formula:

Answer:

In fact, the school formula for the area of a curvilinear trapezoid in the lower half-plane (see simple example No. 3) is special case formulas . Since the axis is specified by the equation, and the graph of the function is located not higher axes, then

And now a couple of examples for your own solution

Example 5

Example 6

Find the area of the figure bounded by the lines , .

When solving problems involving calculating area using a definite integral, a funny incident sometimes happens. The drawing was done correctly, the calculations were correct, but due to carelessness... the area of the wrong figure was found, this is exactly how your humble servant screwed up several times. Here is a real life case:

Example 7

Calculate the area of the figure bounded by the lines , , , .

Solution: First, let's make a drawing:

...Eh, the drawing came out crap, but everything seems to be legible.

The figure whose area we need to find is shaded blue(look carefully at the condition - how the figure is limited!). But in practice, due to inattention, a “glitch” often occurs that you need to find the area of a figure that is shaded in green!

This example is also useful in that it calculates the area of a figure using two definite integrals. Really:

1) On the segment above the axis there is a graph of a straight line;

2) On the segment above the axis there is a graph of a hyperbola.

It is quite obvious that the areas can (and should) be added, therefore:

Answer:

Let's move on to another meaningful task.

Example 8

Calculate the area of a figure bounded by lines,
Let’s present the equations in “school” form and make a point-by-point drawing:

From the drawing it is clear that our upper limit is “good”: .
But what is the lower limit?! It is clear that this is not an integer, but what is it? May be ? But where is the guarantee that the drawing is made with perfect accuracy, it may well turn out that... Or the root. What if we built the graph incorrectly?

In such cases, you have to spend additional time and clarify the limits of integration analytically.

Let's find the intersection points of a straight line and a parabola.
To do this, we solve the equation:

,

Really, .

The further solution is trivial, the main thing is not to get confused in substitutions and signs; the calculations here are not the simplest.

On the segment , according to the corresponding formula:

Answer:

Well, to conclude the lesson, let’s look at two more difficult tasks.

Example 9

Calculate the area of the figure bounded by the lines , ,

Solution: Let's depict this figure in the drawing.

Damn, I forgot to sign the schedule, and, sorry, I didn’t want to redo the picture. Not a drawing day, in short, today is the day =)

For point-by-point construction you need to know appearance sinusoids (and generally useful to know graphs of all elementary functions), as well as some sine values, they can be found in trigonometric table. In some cases (as in this case), it is possible to construct a schematic drawing, on which the graphs and limits of integration should be fundamentally correctly displayed.

There are no problems with the limits of integration here; they follow directly from the condition: “x” changes from zero to “pi”. Let's make a further decision:

On the segment, the graph of the function is located above the axis, therefore:

In the previous section, devoted to the analysis of the geometric meaning of a definite integral, we received a number of formulas for calculating the area of a curvilinear trapezoid:

Yandex.RTB R-A-339285-1

S (G) = ∫ a b f (x) d x for a continuous and non-negative function y = f (x) on the interval [ a ; b ] ,

S (G) = - ∫ a b f (x) d x for a continuous and non-positive function y = f (x) on the interval [ a ; b ] .

These formulas are applicable to solve for simple tasks. In reality, we will often have to work with more complex figures. In this regard, we will devote this section to an analysis of algorithms for calculating the area of figures that are limited by functions in explicit form, i.e. like y = f(x) or x = g(y).

Theorem

Let the functions y = f 1 (x) and y = f 2 (x) be defined and continuous on the interval [ a ; b ] , and f 1 (x) ≤ f 2 (x) for any value x from [ a ; b ] . Then the formula for calculating the area of the figure G, bounded by the lines x = a, x = b, y = f 1 (x) and y = f 2 (x) will look like S (G) = ∫ a b f 2 (x) - f 1 (x) d x .

A similar formula will be applicable for the area of a figure bounded by the lines y = c, y = d, x = g 1 (y) and x = g 2 (y): S (G) = ∫ c d (g 2 (y) - g 1 (y) d y .

Proof

Let's look at three cases for which the formula will be valid.

In the first case, taking into account the property of additivity of area, the sum of the areas of the original figure G and the curvilinear trapezoid G 1 is equal to the area of the figure G 2. It means that

Therefore, S (G) = S (G 2) - S (G 1) = ∫ a b f 2 (x) d x - ∫ a b f 1 (x) d x = ∫ a b (f 2 (x) - f 1 (x)) dx.

We can perform the last transition using the third property of the definite integral.

In the second case, the equality is true: S (G) = S (G 2) + S (G 1) = ∫ a b f 2 (x) d x + - ∫ a b f 1 (x) d x = ∫ a b (f 2 (x) - f 1 (x)) d x

The graphic illustration will look like:

If both functions are non-positive, we get: S (G) = S (G 2) - S (G 1) = - ∫ a b f 2 (x) d x - - ∫ a b f 1 (x) d x = ∫ a b (f 2 (x) - f 1 (x)) d x . The graphic illustration will look like:

Let's move on to consider general case, when y = f 1 (x) and y = f 2 (x) intersect the O x axis.

We denote the intersection points as x i, i = 1, 2, . . . , n - 1 . These points split the segment [a; b ] into n parts x i - 1 ; x i, i = 1, 2, . . . , n, where α = x 0< x 1 < x 2 < . . . < x n - 1 < x n = b . Фигуру G можно представить объединением фигур G i , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n . Очевидно, что на своем интервале G i попадает под один из трех рассмотренных ранее случаев, поэтому их площади находятся как S (G i) = ∫ x i - 1 x i (f 2 (x) - f 1 (x)) d x , i = 1 , 2 , . . . , n

Hence,

S (G) = ∑ i = 1 n S (G i) = ∑ i = 1 n ∫ x i x i f 2 (x) - f 1 (x)) d x = = ∫ x 0 x n (f 2 (x) - f ( x)) d x = ∫ a b f 2 (x) - f 1 (x) d x

We can make the last transition using the fifth property of the definite integral.

Let us illustrate the general case on the graph.

The formula S (G) = ∫ a b f 2 (x) - f 1 (x) d x can be considered proven.

Now let's move on to analyzing examples of calculating the area of figures that are limited by the lines y = f (x) and x = g (y).

We will begin our consideration of any of the examples by constructing a graph. The image will allow us to represent complex figures as unions of more simple figures. If constructing graphs and figures on them is difficult for you, you can study the section on basic elementary functions, geometric transformation of graphs of functions, as well as constructing graphs while studying a function.

Example 1

It is necessary to determine the area of the figure, which is limited by the parabola y = - x 2 + 6 x - 5 and straight lines y = - 1 3 x - 1 2, x = 1, x = 4.

Solution

Let's draw the lines on the graph in the Cartesian coordinate system.

On the segment [ 1 ; 4 ] the graph of the parabola y = - x 2 + 6 x - 5 is located above the straight line y = - 1 3 x - 1 2. In this regard, to obtain the answer we use the formula obtained earlier, as well as the method of calculating the definite integral using the Newton-Leibniz formula:

S (G) = ∫ 1 4 - x 2 + 6 x - 5 - - 1 3 x - 1 2 d x = = ∫ 1 4 - x 2 + 19 3 x - 9 2 d x = - 1 3 x 3 + 19 6 x 2 - 9 2 x 1 4 = = - 1 3 4 3 + 19 6 4 2 - 9 2 4 - - 1 3 1 3 + 19 6 1 2 - 9 2 1 = = - 64 3 + 152 3 - 18 + 1 3 - 19 6 + 9 2 = 13

Answer: S(G) = 13

Let's look at a more complex example.

Example 2

It is necessary to calculate the area of the figure, which is limited by the lines y = x + 2, y = x, x = 7.

Solution

In this case, we have only one straight line located parallel to the x-axis. This is x = 7. This requires us to find the second limit of integration ourselves.

Let's build a graph and plot on it the lines given in the problem statement.

Having the graph in front of our eyes, we can easily determine that the lower limit of integration will be the abscissa of the point of intersection of the graph of the straight line y = x and the semi-parabola y = x + 2. To find the abscissa we use the equalities:

y = x + 2 O DZ: x ≥ - 2 x 2 = x + 2 2 x 2 - x - 2 = 0 D = (- 1) 2 - 4 1 (- 2) = 9 x 1 = 1 + 9 2 = 2 ∈ O DZ x 2 = 1 - 9 2 = - 1 ∉ O DZ

It turns out that the abscissa of the intersection point is x = 2.

We draw your attention to the fact that in the general example in the drawing the lines y = x + 2, y = x intersect at the point (2; 2), therefore such detailed calculations may seem unnecessary. We have provided such a detailed solution here only because in more complex cases the solution may not be so obvious. This means that it is always better to calculate the coordinates of the intersection of lines analytically.

On the interval [ 2 ; 7] the graph of the function y = x is located above the graph of the function y = x + 2. Let's apply the formula to calculate the area:

S (G) = ∫ 2 7 (x - x + 2) d x = x 2 2 - 2 3 · (x + 2) 3 2 2 7 = = 7 2 2 - 2 3 · (7 + 2) 3 2 - 2 2 2 - 2 3 2 + 2 3 2 = = 49 2 - 18 - 2 + 16 3 = 59 6

Answer: S (G) = 59 6

Example 3

It is necessary to calculate the area of the figure, which is limited by the graphs of the functions y = 1 x and y = - x 2 + 4 x - 2.

Solution

Let's plot the lines on the graph.

Let's define the limits of integration. To do this, we determine the coordinates of the points of intersection of the lines by equating the expressions 1 x and - x 2 + 4 x - 2. Provided that x is not zero, the equality 1 x = - x 2 + 4 x - 2 becomes equivalent to the third degree equation - x 3 + 4 x 2 - 2 x - 1 = 0 with integer coefficients. To refresh your memory of the algorithm for solving such equations, we can refer to the section “Solving cubic equations.”

The root of this equation is x = 1: - 1 3 + 4 1 2 - 2 1 - 1 = 0.

Dividing the expression - x 3 + 4 x 2 - 2 x - 1 by the binomial x - 1, we get: - x 3 + 4 x 2 - 2 x - 1 ⇔ - (x - 1) (x 2 - 3 x - 1) = 0

We can find the remaining roots from the equation x 2 - 3 x - 1 = 0:

x 2 - 3 x - 1 = 0 D = (- 3) 2 - 4 · 1 · (- 1) = 13 x 1 = 3 + 13 2 ≈ 3 . 3; x 2 = 3 - 13 2 ≈ - 0 . 3

We found the interval x ∈ 1; 3 + 13 2, in which the figure G is contained above the blue and below the red line. This helps us determine the area of the figure:

S (G) = ∫ 1 3 + 13 2 - x 2 + 4 x - 2 - 1 x d x = - x 3 3 + 2 x 2 - 2 x - ln x 1 3 + 13 2 = = - 3 + 13 2 3 3 + 2 3 + 13 2 2 - 2 3 + 13 2 - ln 3 + 13 2 - - - 1 3 3 + 2 1 2 - 2 1 - ln 1 = 7 + 13 3 - ln 3 + 13 2

Answer: S (G) = 7 + 13 3 - ln 3 + 13 2

Example 4

It is necessary to calculate the area of the figure, which is limited by the curves y = x 3, y = - log 2 x + 1 and the abscissa axis.

Solution

Let's plot all the lines on the graph. We can get the graph of the function y = - log 2 x + 1 from the graph y = log 2 x if we position it symmetrically about the x-axis and move it up one unit. The equation of the x-axis is y = 0.

Let us mark the points of intersection of the lines.

As can be seen from the figure, the graphs of the functions y = x 3 and y = 0 intersect at the point (0; 0). This happens because x = 0 is the only real root of the equation x 3 = 0.

x = 2 is the only root of the equation - log 2 x + 1 = 0, so the graphs of the functions y = - log 2 x + 1 and y = 0 intersect at the point (2; 0).

x = 1 is the only root of the equation x 3 = - log 2 x + 1 . In this regard, the graphs of the functions y = x 3 and y = - log 2 x + 1 intersect at the point (1; 1). The last statement may not be obvious, but the equation x 3 = - log 2 x + 1 cannot have more than one root, since the function y = x 3 is strictly increasing, and the function y = - log 2 x + 1 is strictly decreasing.

The further solution involves several options.

Option #1

We can imagine the figure G as the sum of two curvilinear trapezoids located above the x-axis, the first of which is located below the midline on the segment x ∈ 0; 1, and the second is below the red line on the segment x ∈ 1; 2. This means that the area will be equal to S (G) = ∫ 0 1 x 3 d x + ∫ 1 2 (- log 2 x + 1) d x .

Option No. 2

Figure G can be represented as the difference of two figures, the first of which is located above the x-axis and below the blue line on the segment x ∈ 0; 2, and the second between the red and blue lines on the segment x ∈ 1; 2. This allows us to find the area as follows:

S (G) = ∫ 0 2 x 3 d x - ∫ 1 2 x 3 - (- log 2 x + 1) d x

In this case, to find the area you will have to use a formula of the form S (G) = ∫ c d (g 2 (y) - g 1 (y)) d y. In fact, the lines that bound the figure can be represented as functions of the argument y.

Let's solve the equations y = x 3 and - log 2 x + 1 with respect to x:

y = x 3 ⇒ x = y 3 y = - log 2 x + 1 ⇒ log 2 x = 1 - y ⇒ x = 2 1 - y

We get the required area:

S (G) = ∫ 0 1 (2 1 - y - y 3) d y = - 2 1 - y ln 2 - y 4 4 0 1 = = - 2 1 - 1 ln 2 - 1 4 4 - - 2 1 - 0 ln 2 - 0 4 4 = - 1 ln 2 - 1 4 + 2 ln 2 = 1 ln 2 - 1 4

Answer: S (G) = 1 ln 2 - 1 4

Example 5

It is necessary to calculate the area of the figure, which is limited by the lines y = x, y = 2 3 x - 3, y = - 1 2 x + 4.

Solution

With a red line we plot the line defined by the function y = x. We draw the line y = - 1 2 x + 4 in blue, and the line y = 2 3 x - 3 in black.

Let's mark the intersection points.

Let's find the intersection points of the graphs of the functions y = x and y = - 1 2 x + 4:

x = - 1 2 x + 4 O DZ: x ≥ 0 x = - 1 2 x + 4 2 ⇒ x = 1 4 x 2 - 4 x + 16 ⇔ x 2 - 20 x + 64 = 0 D = (- 20) 2 - 4 1 64 = 144 x 1 = 20 + 144 2 = 16 ; x 2 = 20 - 144 2 = 4 Check: x 1 = 16 = 4, - 1 2 x 1 + 4 = - 1 2 16 + 4 = - 4 ⇒ x 1 = 16 not Is the solution to the equation x 2 = 4 = 2, - 1 2 x 2 + 4 = - 1 2 4 + 4 = 2 ⇒ x 2 = 4 is the solution to the equation ⇒ (4; 2) point of intersection i y = x and y = - 1 2 x + 4

Let's find the intersection point of the graphs of the functions y = x and y = 2 3 x - 3:

x = 2 3 x - 3 O DZ: x ≥ 0 x = 2 3 x - 3 2 ⇔ x = 4 9 x 2 - 4 x + 9 ⇔ 4 x 2 - 45 x + 81 = 0 D = (- 45 ) 2 - 4 4 81 = 729 x 1 = 45 + 729 8 = 9, x 2 45 - 729 8 = 9 4 Check: x 1 = 9 = 3, 2 3 x 1 - 3 = 2 3 9 - 3 = 3 ⇒ x 1 = 9 is the solution to the equation ⇒ (9 ; 3) point a s y = x and y = 2 3 x - 3 x 2 = 9 4 = 3 2, 2 3 x 1 - 3 = 2 3 9 4 - 3 = - 3 2 ⇒ x 2 = 9 4 There is no solution to the equation

Let's find the point of intersection of the lines y = - 1 2 x + 4 and y = 2 3 x - 3:

1 2 x + 4 = 2 3 x - 3 ⇔ - 3 x + 24 = 4 x - 18 ⇔ 7 x = 42 ⇔ x = 6 - 1 2 6 + 4 = 2 3 6 - 3 = 1 ⇒ (6 ; 1) point of intersection y = - 1 2 x + 4 and y = 2 3 x - 3

Method No. 1

Let us imagine the area of the desired figure as the sum of the areas of individual figures.

Then the area of the figure is:

S (G) = ∫ 4 6 x - - 1 2 x + 4 d x + ∫ 6 9 x - 2 3 x - 3 d x = = 2 3 x 3 2 + x 2 4 - 4 x 4 6 + 2 3 x 3 2 - x 2 3 + 3 x 6 9 = = 2 3 6 3 2 + 6 2 4 - 4 6 - 2 3 4 3 2 + 4 2 4 - 4 4 + + 2 3 9 3 2 - 9 2 3 + 3 9 - 2 3 6 3 2 - 6 2 3 + 3 6 = = - 25 3 + 4 6 + - 4 6 + 12 = 11 3

Method No. 2

The area of the original figure can be represented as the sum of two other figures.

Then we solve the equation of the line relative to x, and only after that we apply the formula for calculating the area of the figure.

y = x ⇒ x = y 2 red line y = 2 3 x - 3 ⇒ x = 3 2 y + 9 2 black line y = - 1 2 x + 4 ⇒ x = - 2 y + 8 s i n i a l i n e

So the area is:

S (G) = ∫ 1 2 3 2 y + 9 2 - - 2 y + 8 d y + ∫ 2 3 3 2 y + 9 2 - y 2 d y = = ∫ 1 2 7 2 y - 7 2 d y + ∫ 2 3 3 2 y + 9 2 - y 2 d y = = 7 4 y 2 - 7 4 y 1 2 + - y 3 3 + 3 y 2 4 + 9 2 y 2 3 = 7 4 2 2 - 7 4 2 - 7 4 1 2 - 7 4 1 + + - 3 3 3 + 3 3 2 4 + 9 2 3 - - 2 3 3 + 3 2 2 4 + 9 2 2 = = 7 4 + 23 12 = 11 3

As you can see, the values are the same.

Answer: S (G) = 11 3

Results

To find the area of a figure that is limited by given lines, we need to construct lines on a plane, find their intersection points, and apply the formula to find the area. In this section, we examined the most common variants of tasks.

If you notice an error in the text, please highlight it and press Ctrl+Enter

In this article you will learn how to find the area of a figure bounded by lines using integral calculations. For the first time we encounter the formulation of such a problem in high school, when we have just completed the study of definite integrals and it is time to begin the geometric interpretation of the acquired knowledge in practice.

So, what is required to successfully solve the problem of finding the area of a figure using integrals:

Ability to make competent drawings;
Ability to solve a definite integral using famous formula Newton-Leibniz;
The ability to “see” more profitable option solutions - i.e. understand how it will be more convenient to carry out integration in one case or another? Along the x-axis (OX) or the y-axis (OY)?
Well, where would we be without correct calculations?) This includes understanding how to solve that other type of integrals and correct numerical calculations.

Algorithm for solving the problem of calculating the area of a figure bounded by lines:

1. We are building a drawing. It is advisable to do this on a checkered piece of paper, on a large scale. We sign the name of this function with a pencil above each graph. Signing the graphs is done solely for the convenience of further calculations. Having received a graph of the desired figure, in most cases it will be immediately clear which limits of integration will be used. Thus, we solve the problem graphically. However, it happens that the values of the limits are fractional or irrational. Therefore, you can make additional calculations, go to step two.

2. If the limits of integration are not explicitly specified, then we find the points of intersection of the graphs with each other and see whether our graphical solution coincides with the analytical one.

3. Next, you need to analyze the drawing. Depending on how the function graphs are arranged, there are different approaches to finding the area of a figure. Let's consider different examples on finding the area of a figure using integrals.

3.1. The most classic and simplest version of the problem is when you need to find the area of a curved trapezoid. What is a curved trapezoid? This is a flat figure limited by the x-axis (y = 0), straight x = a, x = b and any curve continuous on the interval from a before b. Moreover, this figure is non-negative and is located not below the x-axis. In this case, the area of the curvilinear trapezoid is numerically equal to a certain integral, calculated using the Newton-Leibniz formula:

Example 1 y = x2 – 3x + 3, x = 1, x = 3, y = 0.

What lines is the figure bounded by? We have a parabola y = x2 – 3x + 3, which is located above the axis OH, it is non-negative, because all points of this parabola have positive values. Next, given straight lines x = 1 And x = 3, which run parallel to the axis OU, are the boundary lines of the figure on the left and right. Well y = 0, it is also the x-axis, which limits the figure from below. The resulting figure is shaded, as can be seen from the figure on the left. In this case, you can immediately begin solving the problem. Before us is a simple example of a curved trapezoid, which we then solve using the Newton-Leibniz formula.

3.2. In the previous paragraph 3.1, we examined the case when a curved trapezoid is located above the x-axis. Now consider the case when the conditions of the problem are the same, except that the function lies under the x-axis. A minus is added to the standard Newton-Leibniz formula. We will consider how to solve such a problem below.

Example 2 . Calculate the area of a figure bounded by lines y = x2 + 6x + 2, x = -4, x = -1, y = 0.

IN in this example we have a parabola y = x2 + 6x + 2, which originates from the axis OH, straight x = -4, x = -1, y = 0. Here y = 0 limits the desired figure from above. Direct x = -4 And x = -1 these are the boundaries within which the definite integral will be calculated. The principle of solving the problem of finding the area of a figure almost completely coincides with example number 1. The only difference is that given function not positive, and still continuous on the interval [-4; -1] . What do you mean not positive? As can be seen from the figure, the figure that lies within the given x's has exclusively “negative” coordinates, which is what we need to see and remember when solving the problem. We look for the area of the figure using the Newton-Leibniz formula, only with a minus sign at the beginning.

The article is not completed.

So, what is required to successfully solve the problem of finding the area of a figure using integrals:

Ability to make competent drawings;
Ability to solve a definite integral using the well-known Newton-Leibniz formula;
The ability to “see” a more profitable solution option - i.e. understand how it will be more convenient to carry out integration in one case or another? Along the x-axis (OX) or the y-axis (OY)?
Well, where would we be without correct calculations?) This includes understanding how to solve that other type of integrals and correct numerical calculations.

Algorithm for solving the problem of calculating the area of a figure bounded by lines:

3. Next, you need to analyze the drawing. Depending on how the function graphs are arranged, there are different approaches to finding the area of a figure. Let's look at different examples of finding the area of a figure using integrals.

Example 1 y = x2 – 3x + 3, x = 1, x = 3, y = 0.

Example 2 . Calculate the area of a figure bounded by lines y = x2 + 6x + 2, x = -4, x = -1, y = 0.

In this example we have a parabola y = x2 + 6x + 2, which originates from the axis OH, straight x = -4, x = -1, y = 0. Here y = 0 limits the desired figure from above. Direct x = -4 And x = -1 these are the boundaries within which the definite integral will be calculated. The principle of solving the problem of finding the area of a figure almost completely coincides with example number 1. The only difference is that the given function is not positive, and is also continuous on the interval [-4; -1] . What do you mean not positive? As can be seen from the figure, the figure that lies within the given x's has exclusively “negative” coordinates, which is what we need to see and remember when solving the problem. We look for the area of the figure using the Newton-Leibniz formula, only with a minus sign at the beginning.

The article is not completed.

Definite integral. How to calculate the area of ​​a figure

Results

Definite integral. How to calculate the area of a figure