Telegony: true or false, scientific facts against this phenomenon. Telegony - true or false

Sometimes parents of Slavic appearance give birth to a child with dark skin. It also happens the other way around: dark-haired and brown-eyed parents are perplexed why they have a blue-eyed, red-haired baby. Some try to explain this as a telegony effect in people.

Each person's genetic material is unique. What signs and features of appearance are encrypted in it, sometimes you can’t even guess. Natural migration leads to mixing of races, Negroid and Mongoloid blood flows into Caucasian blood. Children then receive genetic information, which, being recessive, may not manifest itself until a certain point.

How did the idea of ​​telegony come about?

Aristotle also said that sexual intercourse with a man, after which the woman did not become pregnant, affects the appearance of her future children. It is possible that the same assumption underlies the requirements of many nations for the purity of the bride.

The concept of telegony originated during the formation of the theory of evolution and active selection. Horse breeders tried to cross a purebred horse with a male zebra, but no offspring were produced. After some time, she was crossed with a thoroughbred stallion, but the foal that was born had dark stripes on the rump. Impressed, the scientists continued their research.

A similar phenomenon was observed in the selection of pigeons, dogs, and horses. By analogy with the animal world, a transfer is made to people. Telegony in people - true or false? Geneticists and simply traditional healers and psychics are trying to figure this out.

What is the essence of the phenomenon of telegony?

The effect of the connection with the first male or the influence of the first man is explained by the fact that after sexual intercourse, sperm remaining in the genital tract penetrate to the ovaries. They act on the epithelium of the follicles and change it with their genetic material and become embedded.

This results in a dormant trait that is revealed after conception. It so happens that dark-skinned parents give birth to blondes, or vice versa.

Why is telegony impossible in humans?

Attempts to experimentally replicate the phenomenon of telegony in animals failed. There is no evidence that this is possible. Although some do not give up trying to attribute the birth of children with opposite signs to this factor.

Elementary knowledge about the mechanism of cell fertilization will not even allow us to assume the possibility of telegony. The genetic material of the mother and father includes 50% of the total chromosome set. The fusion of the egg and sperm leads to the formation of a complete embryo.

The color of eyes, hair, melanin content in the skin, height, shape of the face and its parts are determined genetically. All traits are divided into recessive and dominant. If the quality is dominant (for example, brown eyes), then when receiving such a gene the child will be brown-eyed. If the trait, on the contrary, is recessive (blue eyes), then it will manifest itself only when two such genes are combined.

It should be noted that telegony is attributed when crossing animal breeds. People, unlike animals, do not have breeds. Races and nationalities are completely different.

Some people consider surrogacy as proof of the absence of telegony. Planting an embryo into another mother's body does not result in a child that resembles that woman. He naturally inherits the appearance of his genetic parents. Similar experiments were carried out in animals. A white mouse was inoculated with an embryo with black fur, no changes occurred.

In light of the unscientific nature of such a fact as telegony in people, you shouldn’t even think about how to clear a woman of it. This is an idea that became the basis for the justification of chastity among some religious movements and sects. In the scientific world, it belongs to the section of superstitions and outdated false theories.

Of course, telegony is a myth from the category of reptilians from Nibiru. Other answers have already described very fully why this is a misconception. Although there is an article by the Chinese http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.cc/science/article/pii/S0378111913003302 where they are trying to scientifically argue telegony. The article smacks of nonsense and not incompetence, outdated data and Chinese articles.

On the other hand, this is what I would like to add. There is a completely proven process - fetal microchimerism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchimerism). In short: the embryo exchanges some cells with the mother through the placenta (some of these cells are stem cells). Why this is needed is unclear. There are studies that suggest that this is necessary to regulate the functioning of the mother’s endocrine system, as well as prepare for lactation (but this has not been proven!). Such cells can remain in the mother's body; it is unknown why they are not extinguished by T-cells. I would suggest (purely unfounded) that in pregnant women (at lectures on physiology we were once told: “There are three sexes - male, female and pregnant”), due to the hormonal status, immunity is modulated in such a way as not to destroy these cells. If the child is of a different sex, then male markers can then be found in women, for example from the Y chromosome. At the same time, there is a reverse flow of cells - usually these are blood sprouts - lymphocytes, NK, etc. - this is called maternal microchimerism. Researchers http://www.nature.com/labinvest/journal/v86/n11/full/3700471a.html found that 39 percent of those studied had at least one clonal cell line from the mother. This phenomenon has great value during organ transplantation (as well as chimerism).

So (we were told this at a lecture on genetics at the university) it very rarely happens that fetal blood cells remaining in the mother’s body (and which carry the father’s genetic markers, including HLA) during a subsequent pregnancy enter the body of a new embryo and nest there (I can’t find the link in PubMed - if anyone can please comment). If the father is the same, then this would not be noticed, BUT if the fathers are different, then the second child will have some clones of blood cells with genetic markers of the father of the first child. Such cases were found when a transplant was required and screening was carried out, or during a paternity test. It’s even more fun if the child from the first father was not born - a miscarriage or abortion - in this case, the second child will carry some blood lines from his unborn brother/sister with markers of some leftist guy who is no longer legally connected to the mother)) ). Such blood sprouts, of course, are unlikely to affect anything - since their percentage is very small, one can, of course, assume that they will be oncogenic, but most likely (if the immune system works well) they will simply be cleared out.

It would be hilarious (albeit a one in a billion chance) if a chimera woman who had eggs from her unborn twin sister gave birth to such a child and the first one was a miscarriage. The child/mother will need a transplant, they will start looking at markers, HLA, etc. This is where geneticists' eyes will widen - the child's mother will not be his genetic mother, they have different markers, there is nowhere to get the organs from - after all, the twin sister disappeared at the 8-cell stage, having managed to exchange her sexual growth with the child's mother. And in addition, two men left their mark on the child.

Why am I writing all this - and to the fact that biology and genetics are damn interesting and complex things. Once again - there is no telegony, microchimerism exists (but is rare).

Biologists have proven the long-forgotten, or rather artificially consigned to oblivion and ridiculed by official science, fact of the transfer of the genome to children from their parents’ former lovers

It is well known that the genetic material of an unborn child consists equally of the DNA of the mother and father, but scientists have proven that the “left” genes of former sexual partners have no less influence.
Researchers studying fruit flies have found that the size of the offspring is also influenced by the size of the female's previous partner.

As the Daily Mail notes, scientists have found that chemicals contained in the seminal fluid of males have a much longer and more important effect than previously thought. They found that the flies not only “learned” information about partners with whom they did not even produce common offspring, but also partially passed it on to descendants from other males.

Experts are sure that this is also characteristic of the human body.
The theory called telegony is not new. It was proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle.

The word “telegonia” itself comes from the Greek phrase “born away from the father” and refers to the legend about the mythical son of Odysseus - Telegon. According to this myth, Odysseus was killed by chance and his ignorance of his son, born far from him. It was this theory that became one of the reasons why in ancient times marriages of kings with divorced people were prohibited. It was rightly assumed that a woman’s body transmits information to children about ex-husband and the king’s heirs become “not of pure blood.”


Pigeon keepers or dog lovers know: if a non-pedigreed male “spoilt” a female, then, even if no offspring were born, when crossed with a purebred male, she will no longer produce “elite offspring.”

In the Soviet Union (where, with the seizure of power by the Judeo-Bolsheviks, “free love” was promoted in every possible way; then with the liquidation Stalin for a significant part of the Trotskyist-Leninists, the state returned to traditional morals, but again “liberalized” with the arrival of the undead Trotskyist Khrushchev) - telegony was remembered in the 1960s of the last century.

9 months after the 1957 World Youth Festival, many black babies were born in Moscow. Few people were surprised by this, and the bulk of the newborns immediately joined local orphanages. But a few years later, black children suddenly began to be born in some Moscow families. At the same time, the unfortunate mothers admitted that they had their first sexual intercourse several years ago during a festival with a guest from Africa, and gave birth to a child years later from their white husband, whom they did not even think of cheating on. There is also a well-known scandal involving a Moscow State University student from an elite family who gave birth to a black man. It turned out that before her white husband she once had a fellow student-lover - a black man.

As a result of numerous studies, it was found that the telegony effect applies to people in the same way as to all highly organized biological species. If the conception of a child was preceded by the sexual relations of his mother with one or more partners in addition to the father of the child, then the child also had elements of the chromosomal set of the mother’s former lovers. However, the result was not influenced by the use of contraceptives.

Later, when globalist forces felt their power, the geneticists they bought with grants discredited and ridiculed the theory of telegony, calling it a “delusion.” As a result, official science recognized this scandalous theory as a “myth”, at the same time to society (within the framework of “cultural Marxism” and “liberalism” (which are a reflection of the concept of “secret Zionism” of the Hasidic ideologue Asher Ginsburg / Ahad Ham - despite the fact that the “Jews” themselves strongly insisted and insist on “preserving the “purity” of their blood”) - “free sexual relations” were imposed by all means.

Naturally, even in the present period of the “triumph of the victory of Judeo-liberalism” the theory of telegony has countless opponents, especially from those who are pursuing a consistent policy of degeneration of the predominantly Aryan - or as they call the “goyish” peoples.

(Which was reflected in the implementation of the “melting pot” policy - begun Israel Zangwill, and now carried out within the framework of “multiculturalism” by such ideologists of Zionist influence as Barbara Specter). They organize furious attacks and use “irony” in every possible way, but more and more scientists are announcing the discovery of genetic mutations in the child’s chromosomal chain, which can only be explained by telegony.

According to the director of the Swedish Institute of Molecular Biology, Arthur Mingram, DNA analysis of the same people at different periods of their lives made it possible to establish that a woman after childbirth undergoes noticeable changes in her DNA - she acquires the genes of the father of her child. Swedish scientists have found that DNA chains carrying hyaluronic acid, located in male mucous secretions, during intimacy enters the ovaries, where the eggs are stored, and is implanted into them. Thus, a woman, even without becoming pregnant, will carry eggs in which the DNA chains of all her previous sexual partners will be embedded.

In turn, Professor Russell Bondurian Russell Bonduriansky of the University of New South Wales in Australia, who discovered this genetic inheritance system in fruit flies, said: "Conventional science assumes that the father's DNA is passed on through mating only when the fetus is conceived, but we believe the process is much more complex." .

A study of flies he conducted in 2014 revealed that the female is continuously associated with previous partners. Moreover, if the offspring were conceived with a second “spouse,” then its size depended not on the father, but on the previous “lover.” The professor believes that this effect of “long-lasting chemical elements", transmitted to a female from a male individual, was developed in the process of evolution. The body of a female fly stores the DNA of all previous partners and “selects” the best ones, integrating them into their descendants.

In addition, according to the professor, the same thing was observed in the study of gibbons and hawks. Their females passed on to the offspring from the last “husband” “bonuses” from the most powerful male representatives of the species, with whom they had previously entered into short-term marriages without the birth of offspring. "Paternal RNA is too complex system, which has not yet been studied enough,” Bonduriansky said, noting that the theory of telegony works well at the chemical level, despite the fact that it involves the exchange of information using the biofield.

He also suggested that this theory may also apply to males: information about all previous partners may be able to take hold in the male’s body and be transmitted to the offspring through the mother. However, research in in this direction I haven’t done Bondurian yet.

Share